Skip to content

Dynamic resource allocation & partition pruning

Dynamic Resource Allocation is a crucial concept in Spark for optimizing resource utilization at the cluster level. It addresses challenges faced with static resource allocation, especially in multi-user or varied workload environments.

What is Dynamic Resource Allocation (DRA)?#

Dynamic Resource Allocation refers to the ability of a Spark application to dynamically increase or decrease the number of executors it uses based on the workload. This means resources are added when tasks are queued or existing ones need more processing power, and released when they become idle. - Purpose: To make processes run faster and ensure other processes also get sufficient resources. - Context: DRA is a cluster-level optimization technique, contrasting with code-level optimizations like join tuning, caching, partitioning, and coalescing.

Static vs. Dynamic Resource Allocation Techniques#

Spark offers two primary resource allocation techniques: - Static Resource Allocation: - In this approach, the application requests a fixed amount of memory (e.g., 100 GB) at the start, and it retains that allocated memory for the entire duration of the application's run, regardless of whether the memory is actively used or idle. - Default behavior in Spark if DRA is not explicitly enabled. - Drawback: Can lead to resource wastage if the application doesn't constantly utilize all allocated resources, making them unavailable for other jobs. This is particularly problematic for smaller jobs that have to wait for large, static jobs to complete, even if the larger job is underutilizing its resources. - Example Scenario: A heavy job requests 980 GB for executors and 20 GB for the driver (total 1 TB) on a 1 TB cluster. This saturates the entire cluster, leaving no resources for other users' jobs, even small ones. The resource manager, often operating on a First-In, First-Out (FIFO) policy, will make subsequent jobs wait until resources are freed. - Dynamic Resource Allocation: - Dynamically adjusts resources by acquiring more executors when needed and releasing them when they become idle. - Advantage: Optimizes cluster utilization by making resources available to other applications when they are not actively being used by a particular job.

How Dynamic Resource Allocation Works in Detail#

  • Initial Resource Request and Configuration A Spark application typically requests resources using the spark-submit command. For DRA to work, specific configurations must be set. Example Spark Submit Command Parameters (Conceptual): spark-submit \ --conf spark.dynamicAllocation.enabled=true \ --conf spark.dynamicAllocation.minExecutors=5 \ --conf spark.dynamicAllocation.maxExecutors=49 \ --executor-memory 20G \ --executor-cores 4 \ --driver-memory 20G \ --conf spark.dynamicAllocation.executorIdleTimeout=45s \ --conf spark.dynamicAllocation.schedulerBacklogTimeout=2s \ --conf spark.shuffle.service.enabled=true \ --conf spark.dynamicAllocation.shuffleTracking.enabled=true \ your_application.py
  • spark.dynamicAllocation.enabled=true: This is the primary configuration to enable Dynamic Resource Allocation. By default, it is set to false (disabled).
  • spark.dynamicAllocation.minExecutors: Specifies the minimum number of executors that the application will always retain, even if idle. This helps prevent the process from failing if it releases too many resources and cannot re-acquire them when needed later. For example, setting it to 20 ensures at least 20 executors are always available.
  • spark.dynamicAllocation.maxExecutors: Specifies the maximum number of executors that the application can acquire. This acts as an upper limit for resource consumption.
  • --executor-memory 20G: Sets the memory for each executor.
  • --executor-cores 4: Sets the number of CPU cores for each executor, determining how many parallel tasks each executor can run.
  • --driver-memory 20G: Sets the memory for the driver program.

Resource Release Mechanism When an application no longer needs all its allocated resources, Spark can release them: • Trigger for Release: Resources are released when executors become idle, meaning they are not actively performing tasks. • Idle Timeout: By default, an executor will be released if it remains idle for 60 seconds. This can be configured using spark.dynamicAllocation.executorIdleTimeout. ◦ Example Configuration: Setting spark.dynamicAllocation.executorIdleTimeout=45s will release idle executors after 45 seconds. • Spark's Role: Spark internally manages the release of resources. The resource manager (e.g., YARN, Mesos) does not directly request Spark applications to release resources. • Benefit: For instance, if a process initially needed 1000 GB for a join but then transitions to a filter operation requiring only 500 GB, the extra 500 GB can be released, making them available for other processes. 3.3. Resource Acquisition (Demand) Mechanism When an application's workload increases and it needs more resources, Spark will request them: • Trigger for Demand: The driver program identifies the need for more memory/executors (e.g., for a large join operation). • Backlog Timeout: Spark starts requesting more resources if it experiences a backlog of pending tasks for a certain duration. The default is 1 second. This can be configured using spark.dynamicAllocation.schedulerBacklogTimeout. ◦ Example Configuration: Setting spark.dynamicAllocation.schedulerBacklogTimeout=2s will cause Spark to request resources after 2 seconds of a task backlog. • Incremental Acquisition (2-fold): Spark does not request all needed resources at once. Instead, it requests them in a 2-fold manner (doubling the requested executors each time): ◦ Initially, it might request 1 additional executor. ◦ If that's not enough, it will request 2 more. ◦ Then 4, then 8, then 16, and so on, until the required resources are met or maxExecutors is reached.

Challenges and Solutions in Dynamic Resource Allocation While DRA offers significant benefits, it also presents challenges that need to be addressed: • Challenge 1: Process Failure Due to Resource Unavailability ◦ Problem: If an application releases too many resources, and other processes quickly acquire them, the original application might not be able to get back the needed resources on demand, potentially leading to process failure, especially for memory-intensive operations like joins. ◦ Solution: Configure spark.dynamicAllocation.minExecutors and spark.dynamicAllocation.maxExecutors. ▪ By setting a minExecutors value (e.g., 20 out of 49), you ensure that a baseline number of executors is always available to your application, preventing it from completely running out of resources and failing even if it releases others. ▪ maxExecutors prevents over-allocation and resource monopolization. • Challenge 2: Loss of Cached Data or Shuffle Output ◦ Problem: When executors are released, any cached data or shuffle output written to the local disk of those executors would be lost. This would necessitate re-calculation of that data, negating the performance benefits of DRA. ◦ Solution: External Shuffle Service and Shuffle Tracking. ▪ External Shuffle Service (spark.shuffle.service.enabled=true): This service runs independently on worker nodes and is responsible for storing shuffle data. This ensures that even if an executor or worker node is released, the shuffle data persists and can be retrieved later by other executors or if the original executor is re-acquired. ▪ Shuffle Tracking (spark.dynamicAllocation.shuffleTracking.enabled=true): This configuration ensures that shuffle output data is not deleted even when an executor is released. It works in conjunction with the external shuffle service to prevent the need for re-calculation of shuffled data throughout the Spark application's lifetime.

When to Avoid Dynamic Resource Allocation While DRA is generally beneficial, there are specific scenarios where it should be avoided: - Critical Production Processes: For critical production jobs where any delay or potential failure due to resource fluctuation is unacceptable, it is advisable to use Static Memory Allocation. This ensures predictable resource availability and minimizes risk. - Non-Critical Processes / Development: For processes that have some bandwidth for resource fluctuations, or for development and testing environments, Dynamic Resource Allocation is highly recommended

Dynamic Partition Pruning (DPP)#

Dynamic Partition Pruning (DPP) is an optimization technique in Apache Spark that enhances query performance, especially when dealing with partitioned data and join operations. Here's a detailed explanation, including the underlying concepts and scenarios described in the sources: 1. Understanding Partition Pruning (The Foundation) Before diving into Dynamic Partition Pruning, it's essential to understand standard Partition Pruning. • What it is: Partition pruning is a mechanism where Spark avoids reading unnecessary data partitions based on filter conditions. It "prunes" or removes data that is not relevant to the query. • How it works: When data is partitioned on a specific column (e.g., sales_date), and a query applies a filter directly on that partitioning column, Spark can identify and read only the partitions that contain the relevant data. This significantly reduces the amount of data scanned. • Example (Scenario 1): ◦ Imagine a large sales_data dataset partitioned by sales_date. Each date has its own partition. ◦ If you run a query like SELECT * FROM sales_data WHERE sales_date = '2019-04-19', Spark, with partition pruning enabled, will only read the data for April 19, 2019. ◦ Observed in Spark UI: In this example, if there are 123 total partitions, Spark will only read 1 file. The Spark UI's "SQL" tab details will show "Partition Filter" applied, indicating that the date has been cast and used for filtering. 2. The Issue: When Standard Partition Pruning Fails Standard partition pruning works efficiently when the filter condition is directly applied to the partitioning column of the table being queried. However, a common scenario where it fails is when: • You have two dataframes (or tables), say df1 and df2. • df1 is a partitioned table (e.g., partitioned by date). • You need to join df1 and df2. • The filter condition originates from df2 (the non-partitioned table or the table that is not the primary partitioned table being filtered). In such a case, because the filter is applied on df2 and not directly on df1's partitioning column, Spark's optimizer (without DPP) won't know which partitions of df1 to prune at the planning stage. • Example (Scenario 2 - DPP Disabled): ◦ Data: df1 is sales_data (partitioned by sales_date) and df2 is a date_dimension table (containing date and week_of_year columns). ◦ Goal: Find sales data for a specific week, e.g., week = 16. ◦ Query Concept: df1 is joined with df2 (e.g., on date columns), and then df2 is filtered for week_of_year = 16. ◦ Configuration for Demonstration: To observe this issue, Spark's default behavior needs to be overridden by explicitly disabling Dynamic Partition Pruning (spark.sql.set('spark.sql.optimizer.dynamicPartitionPruning.enabled', 'false')) and also potentially disabling broadcast joins. ◦ Observed in Spark UI: When this query is run with DPP disabled, Spark will scan all 123 files of the sales_data table, even though only a few dates (and thus partitions) might be relevant for week 16. The "Partition Filter" section in the Spark UI for df1 will show no effective pruning related to the join condition. This leads to performance degradation. 3. Dynamic Partition Pruning (DPP): The Solution Dynamic Partition Pruning (DPP) addresses the performance issue described above by enabling Spark to prune partitions at runtime. • What it is: DPP is an optimization technique that allows Spark to update filter conditions dynamically at runtime. • How it works (Scenario 3 - DPP Enabled): 1. Filter Small Table: Spark first filters the smaller table (df2, e.g., date_dimension for week = 16) to identify the relevant values (e.g., specific dates that fall in week 16). 2. Broadcast: The relevant values (e.g., the list of specific dates) from the filtered smaller table are broadcasted to all executor nodes. Broadcasting makes this small dataset available on all nodes where the larger table is processed. 3. Subquery Injection: At runtime, Spark then uses these broadcasted values to create a subquery (similar to an IN clause) for the partitioned table (df1). For instance, it essentially transforms the query to look like: SELECT * FROM big_table WHERE sales_date IN (SELECT dates FROM small_table). 4. Dynamic Pruning: This subquery allows Spark to dynamically identify and prune the irrelevant partitions of the large table (df1), reading only the necessary ones. • Example (Scenario 3 - DPP Enabled): ◦ Using the same sales_data (df1) and date_dimension (df2) tables, and the join with week = 16 filter. ◦ Configuration: DPP is enabled (by default in Spark 3.0+ or explicitly enabled) and the broadcast mechanism is active. ◦ Observed in Spark UI: When run with DPP enabled, Spark will only read a small subset of files (e.g., 3 files out of 123 total partitions), as only those files contain the dates relevant to week 16. The "Partition Filter" in the Spark UI will clearly show a "Dynamic Pruning Expression" applied to sales_date. You will also see "Broadcast Exchange" in the execution plan, indicating that the smaller table was broadcasted. 4. Key Conditions for Dynamic Partition Pruning For Dynamic Partition Pruning to work effectively, two primary conditions must be met: 1. Partitioned Data: The data in the larger table (df1 in our example) must be partitioned on the column used in the join and filter condition (e.g., sales_date). If the data is not partitioned, DPP cannot apply. 2. Broadcastable Second Table: The second table (df2), which provides the filter condition, must be broadcastable. This means it should be small enough to fit into memory and be efficiently broadcasted to all executor nodes. If it's too large, it won't be broadcasted, and DPP might not engage. You can also adjust Spark's broadcast threshold value if needed. 5. Spark Version and Default Behavior Dynamic Partition Pruning is a feature introduced in Spark 3.0 and newer versions. In these versions, it is enabled by default. This means that for modern Spark applications, this optimization will often kick in automatically if the conditions are met. Code Examples and Demonstrations The video transcript describes the process using various Spark configurations and demonstrations on the Spark UI, but it does not provide explicit code snippets in the text. • The speaker explains setting Spark configurations like spark.sql.set('spark.sql.optimizer.dynamicPartitionPruning.enabled', 'false') to disable DPP for demonstration purposes. • It also describes data being read (e.g., spark.read.parquet(...)) and joined, with filter conditions applied (e.g., df.filter("sales_date == '2019-04-19'") for basic pruning or join conditions like df1.join(df2, ..., df2.filter("week == 16")) for DPP scenarios). • The core of the explanation lies in how these operations manifest in the Spark UI's "SQL" and "Jobs" tabs, showing the "Number of files read," "Partition Filter," and "Broadcast Exchange" details. • The graphical representation of the subquery injection (WHERE sales_date IN (SELECT dates FROM small_table)) visually explains how the filter from the smaller table is passed to the larger one